TMJ 'dysfunction' - Health implications

Top Climate Scientist Blows Whistle: ‘Global Warming’ ‘Crisis’ Is ‘Manufactured’

One of the world’s most influential climate scientists has blown the whistle with an explosive admission by warning the public that claims of a “crisis” related to so-called “global warming” are “manufactured.”

Judith A. Curry, an American climatologist and former chair of the School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences at the Georgia Institute of Technology, has recently blown the whistle on the claims of a “crisis” related to so-called “global warming” by stating that they are “manufactured.” She has been a leading voice warning that the Earth is facing an “emergency” due to allegedly “man-made climate change.” Recently, the corporate media’s apocalyptic warnings of a “climate crisis” have dramatically increased. However, Dr. Curry has just admitted that the fearmongering “science” has been fabricated to scare the public into believing that there is a “climate emergency.”

According to Curry, one of the simplest and most effective ways for climate “scientists” to gain “fame and fortune” is to make false claims linking the weather to “global warming.” Scientists are pursuing incentives of “fame and fortune” that lead them to exaggerate or even fabricate the alleged risks. It would be easy to assume that Curry is opining on what she thinks scientists are doing. However, she knows exactly how the “climate science” industry works because she was spreading “global warming” hysteria herself.

Curry was previously the darling of the liberal corporate media after she published a study that seemed to show a dramatic increase in hurricane intensity. “We found that the percent of Category 4 and 5 hurricanes had doubled,” says Curry. “This was picked up by the media,” and then climate alarmists realized, “Oh, here is the way to do it,” she said. “Tie extreme weather events to global warming!” The “more intense” hurricanes reported in her findings rapidly gave the alarmists fuel. However, when her work gave her worldwide recognition after it was linked to “climate change,” Curry admits that she enjoyed the green agenda ride.

Curry realized that the critics were right and part of it was bad data, part of it was natural climate variability. Curry was the unusual researcher who looked at criticism of her work and actually concluded: “They had a point.” Then the Climategate scandal taught her that other climate researchers weren’t so open-minded. Alarmist scientists’ aggressive attempts to hide data suggesting climate change is not a crisis were revealed in leaked emails. “Ugly things,” says Curry. “Avoiding Freedom of Information Act requests. Trying to get journal editors fired.” It made Curry realize that there is a “climate-change industry” set up to reward alarmism.

In 1988, the UN created the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). “The IPCC wasn’t supposed to focus on any benefits of warming,” Curry explains. “The IPCC’s mandate was to look for dangerous human-caused climate change.” “Then the national funding agencies directed all the funding - assuming there are dangerous impacts.” The researchers quickly figured out that the way to get funded was to make alarmist claims about “man-made climate change.” This is how “manufactured consensus” happens. Even if a sceptic did get funding, it’s harder to publish because journal editors are alarmists.

Curry reveals that some United Nations officials were motivated by “anti-capitalism.” “They hated the oil companies and seized on the climate change issue to move their policies along,” Curry explains. As Slay News reported, during a recent fearmongering speech, UN Director-General Antonio Guterres declared that “the era of global warming has ended” and “the era of global boiling has arrived.”
Curry’s whistleblowing serves as a reminder that people must always question what they hear, especially if it’s a government or an organization saying it. The world must focus on addressing climate change by implementing smart policies, educating the public, and taking effective actions, but these should be done based on facts, not fearmongering. It is the only way to bring about real change and protect the future of our planet.

To advance in one's career, the path was once clear - attend a prestigious university, secure a high salary, gain access to expansive laboratory space, secure numerous grants, and ultimately become the director of an institute. However, in the present day, we are faced with a different reality: a government-funded climate alarmism complex.

Governments and their media accomplices across the globe are promoting claims of a "climate crisis" to comply with the green agenda goals of unelected globalist organizations such as the World Economic Forum, the United Nations, and the World Health Organization. Meeting these goals typically involves plans to drastically reduce the quality of life for most of the public while ramping up taxes in an effort to "save the planet." Meanwhile, the few powerful elites promoting the green agenda will continue to enjoy luxuries such as private jets and meat consumption because they are deemed "part of the solution."

Renowned scientists, such as Dr. John Clauser, co-winner of the 2022 Nobel Physics prize and an authority on quantum mechanics, and Dr. Patrick Moore, co-founder of Greenpeace, have recently spoken out against the "climate crisis" narrative being pushed by global elites and their allies in the corporate media. Dr. Clauser warned that the "climate emergency" is a dangerous corruption of science that threatens the world's economy and billions of people, while Dr. Moore argues that an increased level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is beneficial and claims of "human-caused" climate change are propaganda that is "dangerous."

These views are echoed by around 300 climate professors who have signed the World Climate Declaration, stating that there is no climate emergency. The declaration argues that climate models are not plausible as global policy tools, exaggerating the effect of greenhouse gases while ignoring any beneficial effects. Climate science has become a discussion based on beliefs, rather than sound self-critical science. Earth's climate has varied with cold and warm periods for as long as the planet has existed, and it is no surprise that we are experiencing a period of warming. The signatories strongly oppose the harmful and unrealistic net-zero CO2 policy proposed for 2050.

In summary, while the traditional path to success in one's career used to be clear, the present day reality is a complex and controversial topic of climate change. With claims of a "climate crisis" being promoted globally by governments and their media allies, the reality of reducing quality of life for the public in an effort to "save the planet" has been met with resistance by renowned scientists who warn against the dangerous corruption of science. The signing of the World Climate Declaration by around 300 climate professors further supports the argument that climate science has become a discussion based on beliefs, not sound self-critical science. As we continue to navigate this complex topic, it is important to remain informed and open-minded to find solutions that are both beneficial and realistic.

Comment:
The earth heats from below. If the skies are covered with chemtrails, it is going to cause global warming which can be blamed on humanity and a good excuse for depopulation when actually the global warming is actually being engineered.
In addition, please see this Youtube video to find out the true method of bringing about global warming.

themsforum.org ©1024 All rights reserved.
© 2024 M.Amir All rights reserved
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------NOTICE-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This article is written under the Human Rights Act 1998: UK Public General Acts 1998 c. 42 SCHEDULE 1 PART I Article 10 for of the long-suffering British public.
The law specifically states that "Everyone has the right to freedom of expression. This right shall include freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart information and ideas without interference by public authority".
Any harassment, direct or indirect, by the ruling bodies or their cronies, will be vehemently pursued through this act and the freedom of expression laws.
Any breaches of the data protection act shall also be brought to the attention of the Information Commissioner's Office and The Law Society.
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................

PS: Taking a stand against the existing paradigm of dental and medical care is very costly. My website has highlighted practices of those who knowingly or unknowingly perpetuate illness. This is obviously not acceptable to the power structure controlling our health. To continue to produce evidentiary articles on my website and this forum - which have enlightened thousands of health practitioners and patients all around the world, to keep my staff employed and my offices viable, we request a little help. If you feel that this article has made an astonishing change in your symptoms, please donate through a window that comes up after a few seconds at dramir.com.