TMJ 'dysfunction' - Health implications

The Global Warming Hoax.
There is a famous equation where "Dr" Bill Gates lays out his concept of the need for "Net Zero carbon dioxide to avoid Global warming."
This is what his equation looks like:

Astute observers have criticized the equation Bill Gates presented during a TED talk, deeming it utterly nonsensical. Nevertheless, he went on to propose that vaccinating the populace could cleverly reduce the global population by 15%. This left me perplexed, as I believed vaccines were meant to save lives, not eliminate a significant portion of humanity.

Sadly, his remarks were met with laughter and an enraptured audience. Now, the same individual fervently supports mRNA vaccines, touting them as life-saving measures. The contradiction is striking: he simultaneously aims to lower the population by while promoting vaccines to save lives.

In light of the ubiquitous rhetoric about carbon dioxide being the root cause of humanity's woes, an informal survey was conducted to determine its actual impact on society. Given the propaganda spread by politicians, media, and entities with dubious intentions, it was not surprising to find that people's perception of the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere was grossly distorted.

Respondents, ranging from individuals with minimal education to those with a PhD, provided answers ranging from 20% to as high as 60%. However, the correct answer is a mere 0.04%. This revelation shocked many and highlights how the incessant rhetoric about reducing carbon dioxide has led to a misrepresentation of its actual quantity in the atmosphere. As a result, thousands of young people have been recruited to protest and insist on bringing carbon dioxide down to "net-zero" as the only way to save humanity.

It is important to recognise that carbon dioxide, being a denser gas, tends to remain close to the Earth's surface, playing a crucial role in plant life. Contrary to popular belief, it does not significantly contribute to global warming and scarcely ascends into the higher layers of the atmosphere. Until the advent of modern satellite technology, measuring its levels aloft was impossible. Historical comparisons using Antarctic ice samples are irrelevant, since they reflect only ground-level concentrations. Reducing carbon dioxide levels by even half, to 0.02%, would spell disaster for life on our planet. This raises a troubling question: is the real agenda behind these efforts to lower carbon dioxide levels a hidden attempt at depopulation, with the public being misled to view it as a commendable objective?

The equation showcased at the TEDs talk featured a variable "P" representing the population. Interestingly, our planet has enough space to accommodate all 7.8 billion people in Alaska, each with an acre of land. If we allocated even a portion of our lawns to food cultivation, we could eliminate food shortages. However, large-scale agricultural practices, reminiscent of the Soviet era, have stripped individuals of the ability to grow their own food. Presently, the engineered closure of factory farms and food storage facilities, coupled with energy shortages, and the ongoing conflict in Ukraine, is driving inflation, hunger, and starvation. This dire situation is being deliberately engineered by governments at the behest of globalists, is resulting in an economic terror.

In the UK, a mere 6% of gas imports came from Russia, yet prices have soared dramatically, compelling people to slash their energy consumption by roughly 20%. This indicates that Russian gas was not essential, leading to an additional 14% reduction in energy demand. Nevertheless, consumers are still being subjected to exorbitant charges. Despite the fall in gas prices, energy companies have not been taxed for their dubious windfall profits.

In September 2022, around 275,000 tons of methane leaked from two Nord Stream pipelines in the Baltic Sea under mysterious conditions. Surprisingly, this incident did not seem to alarm those concerned with global warming.

Sanctions on Russian, Venezuelan, and Iranian oils have not only been imposed as punishment but designed to bring about economic terror and the destruction of European economies. This they have accomplished. It is imperative to be discerning about the rhetoric propagated by various entities, examine their intentions, and scrutinize the veracity of their claims. The goal of humanity should not be to depopulate and conduct genocides, but rather to prioritize the well-being of all people, which includes the accessibility to food, energy, and economic stability.

Statement from Patrick Moore, co-founder of Greenpeace, July 2024
“One of the two dirtiest words in the English language; well, if you're concerned with global warming as so many people are these days, the answer is obvious, the two words are carbon dioxide or as it is known by its chemical symbol CO2, one atom of carbon and two atoms of oxygen. If we pump much more of it into the atmosphere, the argument goes, we're going to alter the climate catastrophically. According to the intergovernmental panel on climate change the IPCC, CO2 emissions from fossil fuels, which constitute 85% of our energy use, must be reduced to zero by 2100. If we don't save ourselves from ourselves, we're toast. That's the claim.

Here's what is strange, though. All life is carbon-based and the carbon for all that life originates from carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. All the carbon in the fossil fuels we are burning for energy to day was once in the atmosphere as carbon dioxide before it was consumed by plankton in the sea and plants on the land.

Coal oil & natural gas are the remains of those plankton and plants that have been transformed by heat and pressure deep in the Earth's crust. In other words, fossil fuels are 100% organic and were produced with solar energy; sounds positively Green.
If there was no carbon dioxide in the Earth's atmosphere the earth would be a dead planet Talk About catastrophic climate change; take away CO2, and you'd have had it and yet, the US Environmental Protection Agency has deemed this essential ingredient for life a pollutant.

How can something that makes life possible be bad. Let's get clear on our terms, it has become common to refer to the emissions from burning fossil fuels or energy as carbon emissions. This is entirely misleading. Carbon dioxide is not carbon. Carbon dioxide is a colourless, odourless, tasteless gas which is an indispensable food, for all living things. Can you have too much of it? In theory, yes, that's what climate alarmists say is happening. Now CO2 levels are getting too high. Are they right?
If we look at the big picture, we find something surprising. For most of the history of life on Earth, carbon dioxide has been present in the atmosphere at much higher levels than it is today. During the Cambrian period when multicellular life first came on the scene CO2 levels were as much as 10 times higher than they are today.

From a big picture perspective, we are actually living in a low carbon dioxide era. The optimum level of CO2 for plant growth, for example, is 4 to 5 times what is currently found in our atmosphere. That's why greenhouse growers worldwide actually inject additional CO2 into their greenhouses. They want to promote plant growth.

Likewise, higher CO2 levels in the Global atmosphere will boost food and Forest productivity that will be helpful since by mid-century we will have to feed 8 to 10 billion people. In fact, we're already seeing the positive effect of increased carbon dioxide now. Satellite measurements have noted the greening of the Earth as crops and forests grow due to our higher levels of CO2. It turns out that carbon dioxide are not dirty words after all. We should celebrate CO2 as the giver of life that it is. I'm Patrick Moore, co-founder of Greenpeace from Prager university.”

© 2024 M. Amir All rights reserved
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------NOTICE-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This article is written in accordance with the Human Rights Act 1998: UK Public General Acts 1998 c. 42 SCHEDULE 1 PART I Article 10, with the intent of serving the resilient British public. This legislation clearly states, Everyone has the right to freedom of expression. This right shall include freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart information and ideas without interference by public authority. We are committed to addressing any form of harassment, whether direct or indirect, by government bodies or their affiliates, in line with this act and the principles that protect freedom of expression. Additionally, any breaches of the Data Protection Act will be promptly reported to the Information Commissioner's Office and The Law Society ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Challenging the existing standards in dental and medical care comes with significant costs. Through my website and this forum, I have highlighted practices that, whether intentionally or unintentionally, contribute to ongoing illness. This disruption is not welcomed by the authorities overseeing our healthcare system. To continue publishing evidence-based articles, sharing discoveries from my own patients' experiences that have led to their recoveries through a unique approach, and educating thousands of health professionals and patients globally, we require some support. If this article has substantially enhanced your understanding, please consider making a donation through this link: PLEASE CLICK TO DONATE

Thank you! A heartfelt thank you to everyone who has generously contributed. Your support is deeply valued and enables Dr. Amir to persist in his mission of fostering improved dental and medical practices globally.

Disclaimer: This educational article focuses on health benefits from individual perspectives and doesn't imply widespread results. Important to seek a doctor's advice before taking action. It's meant to enhance, not substitute for, medical advice and doesn't detail all possible uses or risks. Always prioritize professional medical advice over information read here.