TMJ 'dysfunction' - Health implications

Within this forum, you will discover valuable insights on how a 'dysfunctional' jaw, dental arch anomalies, and various body asymmetries can contribute to illness from a unique perspective. This is your go-to resource for finding effective solutions and achieving lasting relief.
It is currently Thu, 21 Nov 2024, 10:52 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1 post ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: The Nocebo Effect
PostPosted: Fri, 26 Oct 2012, 7:11 pm 
Offline
Site Admin

Joined: Fri, 28 Sep 2012, 9:08 pm
Posts: 233
The Nocebo Effect
Posted: 25 Oct 2012 05:30 PM PDT
Epub: Data-Franco & Berk. The nocebo effect: A clinicians guide. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2012 Oct 23.

This paper aimed to provide an overview on the nocebo effect and evidence-based strategies for management and minimisation of the nocebo effect.

The nocebo effect refers to non-pharmacodynamic, harmful or undesirable effects occurring after inactive [ineffective] treatment, a phenomenon that also occurs in the context of active therapy. Known drivers include classical conditioning and negative expectations concerning treatment. Recent meta-analyses have reported a considerable prevalence, ranging from 18% in the symptomatic treatment of migraine, to more than 74% in multiple sclerosis.

Recognition of the nocebo-driven adverse effects presents a challenge, especially because of its non-specific nature and the similarity to the active medication's expected profile. Traits such as neuroticism, pessimism and type A personalities may predispose individuals to this phenomenon.

Clinical management of the nocebo effect includes awareness and recognition, changing the manner of disclosure of potential drug-related adverse effects, shaping patients' expectations and enhancing the treatment alliance.

It is concluded that the nocebo effect is a common, clinically significant, yet covert driver of clinical outcomes.
Increased awareness of its features, as well as knowledge of strategies on how to manage it, are fundamental so that clinicians can mitigate its impact on clinical practice.

"The nocebo response refers to harmful, unpleasant, or undesirable effects a person manifests after receiving a dummy drug or placebo. Nocebo responses are not chemically generated and are due only to the subject's pessimistic belief and expectation that the inert drug will produce negative consequences."

"In these cases, there is no 'real' drug involved, but the actual negative consequences of the administration of the inert drug, which may be physiological, behavioural, emotional, and/or cognitive, are nonetheless real."

Comment: This is a phenomenal finding. It introduces a chance from 18% to 74% of an effect which is unreal whether the drug is a sugar pill or a real drug. It puts into serious doubt when claims of slight positive effects of any drug therapy are made!


Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on TuentiShare on SonicoShare on FriendFeedShare on OrkutShare on DiggShare on MySpaceShare on DeliciousShare on TechnoratiShare on TumblrShare on Google+
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1 post ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Rules of the BoardThe teamDelete all board cookies
Disclaimer: Please read our Disclaimer of warranties and limitation of liability
Also see information on Intellectual Property Rights
Before posting, please read our Board Rules
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group