TMJ 'dysfunction' - Health implications

Top Climate Scientist Blows Whistle: ‘Global Warming’ ‘Crisis’ Is ‘Manufactured’

One of the world’s most influential climate scientists has blown the whistle with an explosive admission by warning the public that claims of a “crisis” related to so-called “global warming” are “manufactured.”

Judith A. Curry, an American climatologist and former chair of the School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences at the Georgia Institute of Technology, has recently blown the whistle on the claims of a “crisis” related to so-called “global warming” by stating that they are “manufactured.” She has been a leading voice warning that the Earth is facing an “emergency” due to allegedly “man-made climate change.” Recently, the corporate media’s apocalyptic warnings of a “climate crisis” have dramatically increased. However, Dr. Curry has just admitted that the fearmongering “science” has been fabricated to scare the public into believing that there is a “climate emergency.”

According to Curry, one of the simplest and most effective ways for climate “scientists” to gain “fame and fortune” is to make false claims linking the weather to “global warming.” Scientists are pursuing incentives of “fame and fortune” that lead them to exaggerate or even fabricate the alleged risks. It would be easy to assume that Curry is opining on what she thinks scientists are doing. However, she knows exactly how the “climate science” industry works because she was spreading “global warming” hysteria herself.

Curry was previously the darling of the liberal corporate media after she published a study that seemed to show a dramatic increase in hurricane intensity. “We found that the percent of Category 4 and 5 hurricanes had doubled,” says Curry. “This was picked up by the media,” and then climate alarmists realized, “Oh, here is the way to do it,” she said. “Tie extreme weather events to global warming!” The “more intense” hurricanes reported in her findings rapidly gave the alarmists fuel. However, when her work gave her worldwide recognition after it was linked to “climate change,” Curry admits that she enjoyed the green agenda ride.

Curry realized that the critics were right and part of it was bad data, part of it was natural climate variability. Curry was the unusual researcher who looked at criticism of her work and actually concluded: “They had a point.” Then the Climategate scandal taught her that other climate researchers weren’t so open-minded. Alarmist scientists’ aggressive attempts to hide data suggesting climate change is not a crisis were revealed in leaked emails. “Ugly things,” says Curry. “Avoiding Freedom of Information Act requests. Trying to get journal editors fired.” It made Curry realize that there is a “climate-change industry” set up to reward alarmism.

In 1988, the UN created the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). “The IPCC wasn’t supposed to focus on any benefits of warming,” Curry explains. “The IPCC’s mandate was to look for dangerous human-caused climate change.” “Then the national funding agencies directed all the funding - assuming there are dangerous impacts.” The researchers quickly figured out that the way to get funded was to make alarmist claims about “man-made climate change.” This is how “manufactured consensus” happens. Even if a sceptic did get funding, it’s harder to publish because journal editors are alarmists.

Curry reveals that some United Nations officials were motivated by “anti-capitalism.” “They hated the oil companies and seized on the climate change issue to move their policies along,” Curry explains. As Slay News reported, during a recent fearmongering speech, UN Director-General Antonio Guterres declared that “the era of global warming has ended” and “the era of global boiling has arrived.”
Curry’s whistleblowing serves as a reminder that people must always question what they hear, especially if it’s a government or an organization saying it. The world must focus on addressing climate change by implementing smart policies, educating the public, and taking effective actions, but these should be done based on facts, not fearmongering. It is the only way to bring about real change and protect the future of our planet.

To advance in one's career, the path was once clear - attend a prestigious university, secure a high salary, gain access to expansive laboratory space, secure numerous grants, and ultimately become the director of an institute. However, in the present day, we are faced with a different reality: a government-funded climate alarmism complex.

Governments and their media accomplices across the globe are promoting claims of a "climate crisis" to comply with the green agenda goals of unelected globalist organizations such as the World Economic Forum, the United Nations, and the World Health Organization. Meeting these goals typically involves plans to drastically reduce the quality of life for most of the public while ramping up taxes in an effort to "save the planet." Meanwhile, the few powerful elites promoting the green agenda will continue to enjoy luxuries such as private jets and meat consumption because they are deemed "part of the solution."

Renowned scientists, such as Dr. John Clauser, co-winner of the 2022 Nobel Physics prize and an authority on quantum mechanics, and Dr. Patrick Moore, co-founder of Greenpeace, have recently spoken out against the "climate crisis" narrative being pushed by global elites and their allies in the corporate media. Dr. Clauser warned that the "climate emergency" is a dangerous corruption of science that threatens the world's economy and billions of people, while Dr. Moore argues that an increased level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is beneficial and claims of "human-caused" climate change are propaganda that is "dangerous."

These views are echoed by around 300 climate professors who have signed the World Climate Declaration, stating that there is no climate emergency. The declaration argues that climate models are not plausible as global policy tools, exaggerating the effect of greenhouse gases while ignoring any beneficial effects. Climate science has become a discussion based on beliefs, rather than sound self-critical science. Earth's climate has varied with cold and warm periods for as long as the planet has existed, and it is no surprise that we are experiencing a period of warming. The signatories strongly oppose the harmful and unrealistic net-zero CO2 policy proposed for 2050.

In summary, while the traditional path to success in one's career used to be clear, the present day reality is a complex and controversial topic of climate change. With claims of a "climate crisis" being promoted globally by governments and their media allies, the reality of reducing quality of life for the public in an effort to "save the planet" has been met with resistance by renowned scientists who warn against the dangerous corruption of science.

The signing of the World Climate Declaration by around 300 climate professors further supports the argument that climate science has become a discussion based on beliefs, not sound self-critical science. As we continue to navigate this complex topic, it is important to remain informed and open-minded to find solutions that are both beneficial and realistic.

Comment:
The earth heats from the ground up. When you sit on a plane flying at 40,000 feet, the outside temperature is easily - 45 Centigrade, while on the ground it could be 30 degrees C. If the skies are covered with chemtrails, they trap this heat from the ground up and thus cause a warming of the atmosphere. Bill Gates wants to cover the skies, using 1000 aircraft so it hastens global warming, kills all plant life and all humanity. He is getting old and wants to accomplish it during his lifetime. We must not let these selfish, evil globalists getaway with their agenda of killing billions and getting away with it. They have already wipped out millions with no consequence! How is this possible.

Please see this YouTube video to find out the true method of bringing about global warming.

themsforum.org © 2024 All rights reserved.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------NOTICE-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This article is penned in accordance with the Human Rights Act 1998: UK Public General Acts 1998 c. 42 SCHEDULE 1 PART I Article 10, serving the resilient British populace. The legislation explicitly affirms, "Everyone has the right to freedom of expression. This right shall include freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart information and ideas without interference by public authority." Any form of harassment, whether direct or indirect, by governing bodies or their affiliates, will be vigorously challenged under this act and the principles safeguarding freedom of expression. Furthermore, any violations of the Data Protection Act will be promptly reported to the Information Commissioner's Office and The Law society. .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Challenging the current norms in dental and medical care comes at a high price. Through my website and this forum, I have shed light on practices that contribute to the perpetuation of illness, whether intentionally or not. This disruption is unwelcome by the authorities governing our healthcare system. To continue publishing evidence-based articles that have educated thousands of health professionals and patients worldwide, and to maintain my staff and office operations, we need some support. If this article has significantly improved your symptoms, please consider making a donation through the window that appears after a few seconds at: dramir.com.

CONDITIONS OF USE AND IMPORTANT INFORMATION: This article serves solely for educational purposes. The improvements or benefits discussed herein are drawn from individual experiences, which are influenced by the unique health conditions, medical histories, and other personalised factors of those individuals, and should not be assumed to represent universal treatment outcomes. It is imperative to consult your physician before considering any suggestions mentioned. This information is intended to complement, not substitute, the advice of your doctor or healthcare provider and does not encompass all potential uses, precautions, interactions, or side effects. It may not be applicable to your specific health situation. Never delay or ignore seeking professional medical advice from your doctor or another qualified healthcare provider based on something you have read in this article. Always discuss with your doctor or healthcare professional before beginning, discontinuing, or altering any prescribed part of your health care plan or treatment to determine the most appropriate course of therapy for you.